How Anoma solvers work: intent pool, bundles and competition
Quote150 words
Walks through Anoma's intent pool: users publish intents, autonomous solvers match and bundle them into atomic transactions, and the fastest, most efficient bundle wins the fee. Rules are enforced cryptographically, so solvers need no trust.
Key claims
Solving is permissionless and competitive, with the best bundle winning the fee
Solver rules are cryptographically enforced, requiring no trust
TL;DR on Anoma Solvers:
- intents published by users go to the intent pool
- a replicated list is held by all participating nodes
- intents can be simple or complex multi-chain/protocol
- intents in pool until self-fulfilled (transfer) or matched
- solvers are autonomous programs watching intents
- fulfill and weave intents into single atomic txs
- assembling bundles satisfying all rules of user set
- once bundle is built solvers submit to consensus
- no solver trust as rules are cryptographically enforced
- running solvers is permissionless and accessible
- solving is a competition to post the best bundle first
- the quickest and most efficient solver wins fee
- open competition keeps prices and rent-seeking low
- both generalized and specialized solvers competing
- results in a live merit-based market for coordination
- design enables flexible execution with users in control
The future is intent-centric.
Study @anoma.
QUOTING @anoma
Solvers are where Anoma's real magic shows 馃獎 Lock in and learn how they work with Anoma 101: Solvers
Solvers are where Anoma's real magic shows 馃獎 Lock in and learn how they work with Anoma 101: Solvers