zerokn0wledge

Hyli's three differentiators: flexible proving, interoperability, privacy

Thread103 words
BreakdownZKPrivacyHyli

Summarizes Hyli's pitch: free choice of language, proof system (zkVM or zkDSL) and proving service, interoperability through onchain summaries of all application states, and native privacy without a speed trade-off.

Key claims
Developers can use any language, client or server side proving, and any proving service
Hyli keeps a concise summary of all application states onchain for interoperability
The three key USPs of @hyli_org: ➤ Full flexibility: Build with complete freedom. Use any programming language, prove on client or server side, choose your preferred proof system (zkVM or zkDSL), and select any proving service, Decentralized, centralized, or self-hosted. ➤ Real interoperability: Every app on Hyli can seamlessly communicate. By maintaining a concise summary of all application states onchain, Hyli creates a truly interconnected ecosystem. ➤ Scalable privacy: Privacy without compromise. Hyli's native privacy features deliver full confidentiality while maintaining peak performance. No trade-offs between security and speed anymore. Recommend to DYOR. @hyli_org sry for re-dropping, had to fix a typo kek

1 image on X

Open on X
zerokn0wledge avatar
Working together

Research, advisory and builds for deep-tech teams.