Perp DEX volume vs open interest: Hyperliquid, Lighter, Aster, edgeX
Post167 words
Volume can be rented by incentives while open interest is committed risk. Hyperliquid leads OI while Lighter and Aster lead volume, so challengers must prove durability once incentives fade.
Key claims
Hyperliquid $7.276B OI on $2.452B 24h volume
Lighter $1.532B OI on $4.754B 24h volume
Aster $2.448B OI, edgeX $0.743B OI
Volume is activity. It can spike from incentives, campaigns, and short-term routing.
Open interest is committed risk. It’s harder to “rent” for long periods without real traders staying.
From the snapshot here, the top venues don’t lead on the same metric:
➤ @HyperliquidX: $7.276B OI with $2.452B 24h volume ($169.578B 30d)
➤ @Lighter_xyz: $1.532B OI with $4.754B 24h volume ($222.626B 30d volume)
➤ @Aster_DEX: $2.448B OI with $3.644B 24h volume ($184.817B 30d volume)
➤ @edgeX_exchange: $0.743B OI with $2.772B 24h volume ($115.228B 30d volume)
High volume + lower OI usually means more churn (more opening/closing, less position inventory staying around).
High OI means more risk is parked there (bigger position base), which matters for liquidations, funding sensitivity, and how “sticky” liquidity is.
Challengers can buy attention via volume (e.g. Lighter, Aster), but they still need to prove durability: risk management, uptime, market quality, and whether traders stick when incentives fade.
Hyperliquid has had more time to earn “trader credibility”, and its OI lead is consistent with that.
2 images on X
What came next · since 29 Dec 2025
Since then
Zero has written 12 more pieces on Hyperliquid since this one.
- State of Hyperliquid: two years after the airdrop (A1 Research report)On Hyperliquid
- Hyperliquid's US regulatory path: HyperCore, HIP-3 deployers and buildersOn Hyperliquid
- Hyperliquid ecosystem briefing: 14 days of regulation, HIP-3/4, RWAs, revenueOn Hyperliquid
- Why profitable onchain businesses deserve attention: Hyperliquid and PumpOn Hyperliquid