Why the US intervention in Venezuela did not move crypto
Quote342 words18 likes
Summarises an A1 Research piece: the operation left dollar strength, rates, risk appetite and liquidity unchanged, unlike Russia 2022. Post-ETF Bitcoin behaves as a macro asset.
Key claims
Venezuela is ~1% of global oil supply
Fed cut expectations unchanged at ~50bps for 2026
BTC runs ~0.5 correlation with equities
In a global environment dominated by macro trends and geopolitics, understanding the implications for crypto markets is key.
That’s why in our most recent @a1research__ piece our contributor @0xavarek dives deep on the US intervention in Venezuela, and how/why it did (not) impact crypto.
For more content like this, also ensure to drop @machinesmoneyA1 a follow. Something big is happening today!
But back to Trump and Venezuela, here is a TL;DR:
Markets didn’t react because the US intervention doesn’t move the four things that actually drive crypto:
- dollar strength
- interest rates
- risk appetite
- liquidity
None of them shifted.
This isn’t Russia 2022.
Venezuela was already isolated and sanctioned for years. Russia was deeply embedded in global financial plumbing. We’re talking 1% of global oil supply (in terms of actual output on market) versus Russia threatening half of Europe’s energy.
The operation was surgical and done in hours, not a grinding multi-year war such as the Russia-Ukraine conflict. And critically, this intervention ultimately removes sanctions rather than creating new ones.
Running through the transmission mechanisms:
The dollar actually weakened post-strike, which is the opposite of what you’d expect from a flight-to-safety scenario.
Fed cut expectations are unchanged at around 50bps for 2026.
No escalation means risk appetite was never really tested.
The infrastructure investment angle is a multi-year endeavor with no near-term liquidity impact.
But there is more.
Post-ETF Bitcoin is just a different animal.
It’s running around 0.5 correlation with equities and inverse to the dollar. It behaves like a macro asset now, not the digital gold narrative people like to push. Different holder base, different time horizons.
What would actually change the analysis?
Iran escalation, China moving beyond diplomatic protests, or the transition government failing and creating long-lasting regional instability.
Until something like that materializes, this remains noise rather than signal, and the impact on markets is small.
Stay tuned for another geopolitics piece (on Greenland) dropping later today, and don’t forget to follow @machinesmoneyA1 to not miss out on our big announcement dropping later today! 👀
QUOTING @a1research__
t.co/TZsoHrtfoj
t.co/TZsoHrtfoj
1 image on X