Papertrade staker income collapse: $6.7M to $88K a day and PAPER scenarios
Post861 words14 likes
Staker payouts fell from $6.7M to $88K a day between 15 and 21 Oct; ~84% of the $62M headline revenue was LP overflow, i.e. trader losses passed through, not fees. Scenario values for PAPER range from $0.0006 to $0.19.
Key claims
Fee pool ~$9.8M of $62M, ~$53M was LP overflow
Staker income per volume 0.52bp on 16 Oct vs 0.05bp on 21 Oct
Scenarios: wipeout ~$0.0006, base ~$0.019, bull ~$0.19 per PAPER
$6.7M a day to $88K a day in under a week.
That's what @papertrade_xyz paid its $PAPER stakers on the 15th vs the 21st of October.
CT has a clear culprit: the "PAPER stays non-transferable" post from the 19th. But the data actually shows that the collapse already started two days before that post. And the $62M of "revenue" that made Papertrade a top fee earner in crypto was never really revenue to begin with.
Wait what?
Let's talk about where the $62M came from.
Papertrade charges a 2% fee on realized PnL and liquidated margin, split 50/50 between stakers and the devs. Dev fees sit at $4.9M lifetime, so the entire fee pool was ~$9.8M.
The other ~$53M was LP overflow. The house LP is capped at $5M, and every dollar of net trader losses above that cap gets swept straight to stakers.
In other words: ~84% of the headline number, and 91% of what stakers actually received, was traders losing money (a lot of them on purpose, to farm PAPER), passed through to other traders. Not a take on $1.45T of volume.
That matters bc a fee business shrinks with volume, while a loss pass-through shrinks with losses. And losses stop the moment losing stops paying.
What actually broke on the 17th?
Staker income per unit of volume:
- 16 Oct: $5.02M on $96.5B = 0.52bp
- 17 Oct: $0.78M on $54.2B = 0.14bp
- 21 Oct: $88K on $19.0B = 0.05bp
Volume fell ~5x. Staker income fell ~57x (with the gap being the overflow).
The 18th to 20th bounced to $1.3M to $2.1M a day, but never back near the 15th's $6.7M.
You can even see the exact day it switched off. On the 20th, stakers still took $1.30M of $1.45M in fees, which only works with overflow running. On the 21st they took $88K of $177K. Exactly half. Fee share only, zero overflow.
So what did the transferability ban announcement actually do?
It didn't kill demand. It killed the exit.
- Paragon halted its para:PAPER pre-market perp at 22:31 UTC, a minute after the post, and settled it at $0.0263
- OI went from ~$540M to ~$296M within a day as hedged farmers unwound
- TVL sits at ~$40M, down from $102M at the peak on the 11th, with -$26.2M of net flows over 7d
Meanwhile funded accounts still grow by ~300 a day and margin in open positions holds around $6.5M. That looks like the organic floor for now, and it barely moved.
How much of the remaining ~$14B a day is organic? Honestly, nobody knows. Three identified farming wallets alone did ~$33B of volume, and the top 25 losers did ~$114B and hold ~23% of all PAPER. Anyone giving you a clean organic % is guessing.
What's PAPER worth then?
There is no spot market, so this is a "what would it be worth if it could trade" exercise.
On the fee share alone, ~$100K a day, stakers earn ~$36M a year, or ~$0.004 per PAPER. That's a ~16% yield at Paragon's $0.0263 settlement. The same settlement price was 0.4x the income run-rate on the 19th. On the fee floor it's ~6.4x. With overflow back on (more below), the last 24h annualizes to ~$250M, or ~0.9x.
My scenarios (12m staker income x multiple):
- Wipeout: $1B/day at 0.04bp = $1.5M, 4x, ~$0.0006
- Bear: $5B/day at 0.04bp = $7.3M, 4x, ~$0.003
- Base: $15B/day at 0.06bp = $33M, 6x, ~$0.019
- Bull: $30B/day at 0.2bp = $219M, 10x, ~$0.19
For reference, HYPE trades at roughly 18x annualized fees on circulating mcap.
Farming is also dead at these rates. Under the announced mint curve, one-sided loss farming costs ~$0.11 of losses per PAPER vs ~$0.004 a year of yield. A 28-year payback, which no one who does the math will go for. Even at the last 24h's overflow-boosted rate it's ~4 years.
My take?
Papertrade didn't break on the 19th. The launch economics were a loss pass-through funded by farmers, and that started running dry on the 17th. The transferability ban announcement just made it stick by removing the reason to farm.
What's left is a 1000x venue doing ~$14B a day, with a house that is structurally short the crowd's net position on ~$5M of capital. Traders are net long ~$90M of BTC, and a +1% BTC move costs the house ~$900K. Rough math: a ~5.5% pump empties the LP into the payout queue.
The one number to watch flipped while I was writing this tho: at 13:00 UTC today the LP hit the $5M cap and overflow restarted. Stakers got $694K over the last 24h, most of it in the last three hours. And the cap is still $5M on-chain, not the $10M floated on the 17th.
Also watching:
- Whether overflow holds or the LP slips back under the cap
- Staker take holding above 0.1bp on a full day
- Any move on transferability
- A second oracle event
No position, didn't farm it. It's definitely an interesting experiment tho. Just covering a 1000x casino that, as it seems for now, ran out of people paying to lose on purpose.
NFA ofc.
1 more image on X